Each time a financial services company offers a customer a product it must disclose everything from fees, interest rates, purchase options and minimum balance requirements as well as potential risks. These disclosures must be clear and consistent throughout the purchase process, and across every touchpoint from a physical office to a Web site to even a phone call.
As public officials and regulators increase their oversight of the industry, the cost –financial and otherwise – of noncompliance is rising. In recent months, three large banks have been fined for disclosure failures. The largest was a 23.9 million-pound (30.9 million USD) fine against a large financial insurance company by the UK Financial Conduct Authority for not telling customers that they had the right to shop for options when purchasing annuities.
Managing disclosures becomes more challenging with each new product an organization offers in each new market. For example, one bank may offer multiple credit cards, each with its own terms, charges, and benefits that may differ across geographies as well as for versions of the same card, such as a standard versus a promotional offer.
Additionally, two factors new to the equation are making disclosure compliance even more complex. The first is that regulators, in response to increasing concerns about customer protection, are changing their disclosure requirements more often. The second is that customers who might formerly have interacted with a company through only one channel (a paper application in a physical office) now might choose to communicate over multiple channels. All of this is requiring financial institutions to spend time and money to make updates across what can be a complex mixture of products, communications, and channels.
Organizations often maintain different teams to create, edit and manage the disclosures on different document templates for every variation of every product and different distribution systems for each communication channel. This is a recipe not only for manual errors but for delays in making changes to a disclosure simultaneously across every channel. Organizations report a single change cycle can take a minimum of six weeks and require hundreds of tedious, manual, repetitive revisions across the hundreds of communications materials that support each product.
All this extra work not only drives up costs but increases the risk of both regulatory fines and of damage to the organization’s brand if it is found negligent in disclosure. The need to fix the problem and notify customers can mean more cost and harmful publicity. All these outcomes are unacceptable when margins are under pressure in a low-interest rate environment, and established players are facing threats from new digital competitors.
There is a better way: Modernizing and automating the disclosure process to replace duplicate, error-prone manual processes with streamlined, automated workflows that cut cost, time, and risk. However, for such a transformation to be successful, the move requires the following considerations:
With the proper tools and streamlined processes, financial services providers have eliminated 70 percent of the steps required to change disclosures and slashed the time required from months to less than one day. While increasing their agility they have also reduced their risk with improved insight into and oversight of the proofing and review cycle and improved their confidence that the right changes were made in an accurate and timely way.
The need to comply with stricter regulatory oversight of disclosures will only grow over time. So will the need to offer more products, in more versions, to more markets. Streamlining your disclosure processes is not only essential to reducing your costs and risks, but to enabling the agility required to compete in an ever more challenging financial services environment.
(Originally published in Corporate Compliance Insights)
Cut your time by 70% and apply changes with 100% accuracy As a marketer, it’s your job to…
Read the articleWhen the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) at a leading North American wealth management firm learned about the Regulation…
Read the customer storyChallenge: Limitations of a complex legacy process The bank realized it needed a solution to address the inefficiencies…
Read the customer story